Relations of production - Revision history

Cassette: Wasn't sure if this needed references but put it here just in case as it doesn't have any

2024-05-25T13:31:10Z

Wasn't sure if this needed references but put it here just in case as it doesn't have any

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:31, 25 May 2024
Line 6:		Line 6:
	[[Category:Marxist terminology]]		[[Category:Marxist terminology]]
	[[Category:Marxist theory]]		[[Category:Marxist theory]]
			[[Category:Pages needing references]]

Amicchan at 17:50, 2 November 2022

2022-11-02T17:50:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:50, 2 November 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Relations of production''' is a concept frequently used by [[Marx\|Karl Marx]] and [[Engels\|Friedrich Engels]] in their theory of [[historical materialism]] and in ''[[Library:Capital, vol. I\|Das Kapital]]''.		'''Relations of production''' is a concept frequently used by [[Marx\|Karl Marx]] and [[Engels\|Friedrich Engels]] in their theory of [[historical materialism]] and in ''[[Library:Capital, vol. I\|Das Kapital]]''. to refer to the sum total of social relationships that people ''must'' enter into in order to survive, to produce, and to reproduce their means of life. As people ''must'' enter into these social relationships, i.e. because participation in them is not voluntary, the totality of these relationships constitute a relatively stable and permanent ''structure'', the "economic structure" or [[mode of production]].

	Some social relations are voluntary and freely chosen (a person chooses to associate with another person or a group). But other social relations are involuntary, i.e. people can be socially related, whether they like that or not, because they are part of a family, a group, an organization, a community, a nation etc.		Some social relations are voluntary and freely chosen (a person chooses to associate with another person or a group). But other social relations are involuntary, i.e. people can be socially related, whether they like that or not, because they are part of a family, a group, an organization, a community, a nation etc.

	By "relations of production", Marx and Engels meant the sum total of social relationships that people ''must'' enter into in order to survive, to produce, and to reproduce their means of life. As people ''must'' enter into these social relationships, i.e. because participation in them is not voluntary, the totality of these relationships constitute a relatively stable and permanent ''structure'', the "economic structure" or [[mode of production]].		Throughout history social property appeared in the form of the property of the clan and the tribe ([[primitive communism]]), public or state property ([[socialism]]), cooperative and community property ([[communism]]), etc. — while private ownership appears in history through: slave property, feudal property, and capitalist property. From all forms of ownership correspond lesser or greater types of exploitation of human by human.

	Throughout history social property appeared in the form of the property of the clan and the tribe (primitive communism), public or state property (socialism), cooperative and community property (communism), etc. – while private ownership appears in history through: slave property, feudal property, and capitalist property. From all forms of ownership correspond lesser or greater types of exploitation of human by human.
	[[Category:Marxist terminology]]		[[Category:Marxist terminology]]
	[[Category:Marxist theory]]		[[Category:Marxist theory]]

Jucheguevara at 17:26, 10 August 2021

2021-08-10T17:26:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 10 August 2021
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Throughout history social property appeared in the form of the property of the clan and the tribe (primitive communism), public or state property (socialism), cooperative and community property (communism), etc. – while private ownership appears in history through: slave property, feudal property, and capitalist property. From all forms of ownership correspond lesser or greater types of exploitation of human by human.		Throughout history social property appeared in the form of the property of the clan and the tribe (primitive communism), public or state property (socialism), cooperative and community property (communism), etc. – while private ownership appears in history through: slave property, feudal property, and capitalist property. From all forms of ownership correspond lesser or greater types of exploitation of human by human.
	[[Category:Marxist terminology]]		[[Category:Marxist terminology]]
			[[Category:Marxist theory]]

Jucheguevara at 17:26, 10 August 2021

2021-08-10T17:26:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 10 August 2021
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Throughout history social property appeared in the form of the property of the clan and the tribe (primitive communism), public or state property (socialism), cooperative and community property (communism), etc. – while private ownership appears in history through: slave property, feudal property, and capitalist property. From all forms of ownership correspond lesser or greater types of exploitation of human by human.		Throughout history social property appeared in the form of the property of the clan and the tribe (primitive communism), public or state property (socialism), cooperative and community property (communism), etc. – while private ownership appears in history through: slave property, feudal property, and capitalist property. From all forms of ownership correspond lesser or greater types of exploitation of human by human.
			[[Category:Marxist terminology]]

Jucheguevara: added some paragraphs to replace the first section, kept the latter section of the paragraph

2020-11-19T06:36:07Z

added some paragraphs to replace the first section, kept the latter section of the paragraph

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:36, 19 November 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Production is not possible without relations~~ of production ~~– humans cannot produce outside~~ of a social ~~structure~~, whether ~~a nation~~ or a family ~~– relations of production exist for all producers~~. ~~The basis of the~~ relations of production ~~is ownership of~~ the ~~means~~ of ~~production. When the means of production become public property, then all~~ people ~~are able~~ to ~~exercise their freedom in relation~~ to ~~the productive forces through the social~~ and ~~political structures~~ of ~~society~~. ~~To the extent that~~ people ~~enjoy equal rights they are thus able exercise~~ these ~~rights freely~~ in ~~the real development of society~~, ~~unhindered by~~ the ~~barriers~~ of ~~private property. With the existance of private property, competition~~ and ~~exploitation hinder the real freedom of humans~~, ~~where only a handful have ownership of~~ the ~~means~~ of production. Throughout history social property appeared in the form of the property of the clan and the tribe (primitive communism), public or state property (socialism), cooperative and community property (communism), etc. – while private ownership appears in history through: slave property, feudal property, and capitalist property. From all forms of ownership correspond lesser or greater types of exploitation of human by human.		'''Relations of production''' is a concept frequently used by [[Marx\|Karl Marx]] and [[Engels\|Friedrich Engels]] in their theory of [[historical materialism]] and in ''[[Library:Capital, vol. I\|Das Kapital]]''.

			Some social relations are voluntary and freely chosen (a person chooses to associate with another person or a group). But other social relations are involuntary, i.e. people can be socially related, whether they like that or not, because they are part of a family, a group, an organization, a community, a nation etc.

			By "relations of production", Marx and Engels meant the sum total of social relationships that people ''must'' enter into in order to survive, to produce, and to reproduce their means of life. As people ''must'' enter into these social relationships, i.e. because participation in them is not voluntary, the totality of these relationships constitute a relatively stable and permanent ''structure'', the "economic structure" or [[mode of production]].

			Throughout history social property appeared in the form of the property of the clan and the tribe (primitive communism), public or state property (socialism), cooperative and community property (communism), etc. – while private ownership appears in history through: slave property, feudal property, and capitalist property. From all forms of ownership correspond lesser or greater types of exploitation of human by human.

Forte: Created page with "Production is not possible without relations of production – humans cannot produce outside of a social structure, whether a nation or a family – relations of production ex..."

2020-11-16T01:08:04Z

Created page with "Production is not possible without relations of production – humans cannot produce outside of a social structure, whether a nation or a family – relations of production ex..."

New page

Production is not possible without relations of production – humans cannot produce outside of a social structure, whether a nation or a family – relations of production exist for all producers. The basis of the relations of production is ownership of the means of production. When the means of production become public property, then all people are able to exercise their freedom in relation to the productive forces through the social and political structures of society. To the extent that people enjoy equal rights they are thus able exercise these rights freely in the real development of society, unhindered by the barriers of private property. With the existance of private property, competition and exploitation hinder the real freedom of humans, where only a handful have ownership of the means of production. Throughout history social property appeared in the form of the property of the clan and the tribe (primitive communism), public or state property (socialism), cooperative and community property (communism), etc. – while private ownership appears in history through: slave property, feudal property, and capitalist property. From all forms of ownership correspond lesser or greater types of exploitation of human by human.